Blog

Hiring a data engineer means evaluating something most interview processes never touch: whether this person has kept production data systems running, and what it cost them to learn how.

"They are still looking." That is the sentence that kills projects. I recently saw a critical migration stall for six weeks. Not because talent was scarce. But because the "Preferred Supplier" list was rigid.

Your Hiring Isn't Data-Driven. It's Just Slow. Most companies claim to be data-driven. Then they hire like it's 1990. They track "Time-to-Hire". That is a vanity metric. They track "Number of Applicants".

You don't see it on the invoice. You see it on the P&L. We call it the Innovation Tax. It represents the silent cost of a €600k strategic initiative sitting idle because HR is still "scheduling round 3" for a single engineer.

Volume is Not an Asset. It is a Denial of Service Attack. Platforms sell you the "Endless Talent Pool" as a benefit. It is not. It is a liability. Receiving 300 CVs for a Data Engineer role is not a "pipeline".

You audit your AWS bill for unused instances. You audit your software licenses for compliance. But you blindly pay a 30% markup on a freelancer who is sub-contracted twice before they reach your desk.

The End of "Good Enough": Why the Middle Market is Dying. 2025 is the year the platform model broke. A CTO in Paris recently told me: "I don't need 200 options. I need 3 that work."

Remote Work Isn't Risky. Your Office is Hiding Inefficiency: "We need them on-site to maintain control." Incorrect. On-site work allows mediocrity to hide behind attendance.